PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Alaska Airlines 737-900 MAX loses a door in-flight out of PDX
Old 8th Jan 2024, 05:20
  #338 (permalink)  
lateott
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: U.S.
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dragon6172
I think we will find out that the lift assist springs were out of adjustment. I would guess they are not designed to be providing a constant upward force on the door, which would put a constant force on that locking bolt.

It's right there in the name, lift assist spring. So, for example, if the plug weighs 100 lb, then the spring may provide 70 lb of upward force, and a mechanic opening the plug would only have to provide 30 lb of force to lift the plug high enough for the door stop fittings to clear the fuselage stop pads. This setup would cause a constant downward force (from the weight of the plug) keeping the upper guide roller in the door upper guide track fitting. And no constant force on the locking bolts

If the lift assist spring was adjusted in such a way that there was a constant force applied to the locking bolts, then I could see how after 3 months of vibrations the two bolts wear down and eventually fracture, which would allow the door open on its own.
Three thoughts on that:

1) The spring hinges are present to keep the door from closing after it is opened. Therefore, it would seem like they need to have sufficient force to hold the weight of the door, or the plug, whichever is fitted to a given aircraft.
2) If the same springs are used with the actual emergency door for those aircraft equipped with actual mid-cabin exits, the spring force would be far greater than is necessary to lift the plug (doors are much heavier).
3) Is there an actual source for the term "lift assist spring" in this case?

Last edited by lateott; 8th Jan 2024 at 05:42. Reason: Additional description
lateott is offline