Originally Posted by
Easy Street
I wonder how Mr Hill intends to approach the matter of his susceptibility to, ahem, "cognitive impairment" when asked by the AMO during his renewal examination. After building his criminal defence upon an unpredictable occurrence of the condition (of which remarkably little - nothing? - seems to have been written since), it would be cakeism on almost a Johnsonian scale for him to claim to that he is now safe to fly. I wonder if the CAA is prepared to refuse a medical on the grounds of Hill's "impairment" to see if he will expose himself to ridicule by downplaying the "condition" on appeal?
Was his defence not that he lost awareness while pulling 4 g ?
AFAIK, display flying to the same level has not been banned. What would happen if he got his licence back and had a problem at 3 g.
He should hang up his boots.