Farney,
I think you have defeated your own argument!
Having large amounts of jet IFR traffic floating around in the FIR without the fine service that Farnborough provide would be a recipe for disaster and almost certainly result in an increase in incidents/airprox reports. For just this reason, IMHO, NATS will not ditch providing a LARS service as long as the IFR traffic they are contracted to provide a service to, are operating in Class G airspace with little protection other than the 'known traffic environment' generated by the LARS service.
My original point though, was that the provision of that LARS service has little to do with how much Spangly or me(!) are paid and attempting to get the Private Flying community to write to NATS and/or Prospect is going to do little towards helping Farnborough ATCOs pursue their, undoubtedly justified, pay claim.
The threat to the continued provision of a LARS service comes and always has come from a lack of FUNDING. Wee Jock has identified exactly what the current problem is and provided some figures which illustrate exactly why the service is doomed unless a service provider has another reason to deliver the service, as in Farnborough's case. Given the correct level of funding for the provision of this valuable service, NATS along with many other service providers will be queuing up to offer the type of fine service that Farnborough offers today, for many years to come.
.