PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Lufty at SFO
Thread: Lufty at SFO
View Single Post
Old 3rd December 2023 | 10:20
  #340 (permalink)  
safetypee
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 353
From: UK
… this expediency must be balanced with safety, wisdom

Req Orbit
A 'system' issue; requires joined-up thinking

For general info:
FAA SAFO 21005 - Risks Associated with Visual Approaches.
"… this expediency must be balanced with safety,"
"Judicious (wise) use of visual approaches." Day vs night.
"… the likelihood of aligning with the wrong runway …"

These risks can be mitigated effectively by employing strategies such as:
Communicating “UNABLE” to ATC when, in the judgment of the pilot-in-command (PIC), compliance with a specific instruction, request, or clearance may reduce safety.

N.B. Class B Airspace VFR, 3 statute miles visibility and clear of clouds (SVFR 1 st m, SVFR is never offered by Air Traffic Control. It must be requested by the Pilot in Command.)

https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/fi.../SAFO21005.pdf


FAA SAFO 17010
Note SFO incident as the prime example
"Conducting an approach in visual conditions increases the potential for confusing visual clues such as airport lighting configuration, surrounding lights, or areas that look similar to the airport. Therefore, use of the most precise available approach or Flight Management System (FMS) RNAV navigational aids will serve to support pilot and flightcrew decisions."

https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/fi.../SAFO17010.pdf


safetypee is offline  
Reply