Originally Posted by
Bell_ringer
iirc Bell have automated the auto entry and maintaining optimal RRPM in the 525.
This in itself is useful in singles, as that is usually where the problems start.
It is easier to pick a better spot when some of the mental workload has been offloaded and you can focus on what direction you need to be pointing towards.
There is a broad range of competency and talent flying light helicopters, and that is a level of automation that can make a difference to safety.
It isn't a replacement for good technique, particularly if the technology fails at the wrong moment, and if it doubles the price of the ship then no one will want it.
Maybe Hill can quickly add that as an option to the HX50
There are pros and cons to every system, you make a good point.
Personally, I don't want to fly a single engine helicopter with an automated system that will enter autorotation whenever it thinks there has been an engine failure. Erroneous "engine out" warnings are not unheard of. Anyone remember the Bell engine overspeed protection system? No thanks. The benefits don't outweigh the risks.
My opinion, YMMV.