PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Lufty at SFO
Thread: Lufty at SFO
View Single Post
Old 15th Nov 2023, 05:04
  #138 (permalink)  
Request Orbit
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 97
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Check Airman
Have you seen the second video? It’s a bit long, but it clearly explains what ATC was dealing with.
I’m assuming that it’s the one that explains it with a diagram like this. A normal 10-min traffic sequence would look like this:
.x….x….x….x….x…
..x….x….x….x….x.

To land the DLH would look like this:
.x….x….…x….x..
​..x…..……..x….x.

A halving of the landing rate would look like this:
.x….x….x….x….x..
​​​​​…………………………..

Or alternatively this;
.x……..x……..x…
…….x……..x……..

Doing full instrument approaches for every aircraft halves the landing rate, making an individual gap for an individual instrument aircraft should not halve the landing rate, and I didn’t see anything in the video to suggest otherwise. Sure, 3 gaps in a busy sequence is still a hit, but it’s infinitely different to drop to 57 planes in an hour, not the 30 planes in an hour that guy was claiming.
Request Orbit is offline