This post might be better presented as a poll; if so, mods (JT) please help.
The document (33 slides) -
https://speakerdeck.com/stevenshorro...ii-in-practice asks, …
“
What are your experiences of the key challenges and opportunities for Resilience Engineering and Safety-II as a practitioner?”
The collated views of the '
practitioners' (slide11) are listed below:-
Given the discussion in this thread, how do front line operators agree or otherwise with these findings ?
Any differences between regulatory authorities; EASA, FAA, Other ?
-
- The term ‘resilience’ is often seen as an individual trait
- There is limited understanding of the concepts of RE and S-II
- Theoretical writings aren’t always helpful
- Resilience Engineering and Safety-II
- The practical application of RE and S-II is opaque or difficult
- There is a lack of evidence of effectiveness
- The dominant paradigm, collective mindset or common focus is a barrier
- There are entrenched and conflicting legacy approaches
- The need is not evident or the value is unclear
- There is a lack of resources (competency, time, money)
- RE and S-II ideas are understood, appreciated and talked about
- RE and S-II offer a better explanation of the world
- Practical opportunities to learn and move toward a better understanding of work
- (Few) Opportunities for usable and practical methods
- (Few) Opportunities to develop expertise in RE and S-II
Note general observations and what might be done (31/32), is this being done ?