As you probably already know, the executive Nathan Safe quoted in the article is that Nathan Safe the ex President of AIPA and apparently still an operational F/O when he's not in the office 'earning' his bonus.
As a pilot applying for a gig with qantas, that's why you need all of the external coaching to get through the psych and aptitude testing, to fool them into thinking you're a company tool like Nathan Safe. If you're a company tool, like Nathan Safe, you won't need all of those programs.
Nathan Safe needs to get out a little. Some of those legacy airlines pay a LOT more than qantas does.
Also, it's further proof that
ONE union should be representing
ALL pilots Australia wide. Like the Teamsters. The Teamsters wouldn't tolerate a tool like Nathan Safe.