PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Thoughts about this odd SOP....
View Single Post
Old 18th September 2023 | 10:30
  #6 (permalink)  
fdr
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
: ATPL
Posts: 4,087
Likes: 4,429
From: 3rd Rock, #29B
Shy, your logical and reasonable answer would avoid the response to Landing Gear..................... AS REQD.

It is up to the operator to determine how they standardise, but it is irrational to have a response to a variable that doesn't state the system state. If you are briefing navaids, an imperious wave of the hand and a response "set" is hardly a confirmation of the state of the FMC, VOR, DME, ILS etc, so it would seem to follow that a system that can spoil your day, say, like Helios, should have a confirmation of state, and the term SET is interchangeable with, "AS REQD".

Whatever the trainer says, that should be the company policy, and it should be specified as being what the owner of the ball wants, loopy or otherwise.

Take the training, nod, and if it intolerable, vote with your feet. Every system has it's idiosyncacies.. makes it far more interesting.
fdr is offline  
Reply