PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - MPs debate implications of insolvent ATOs
Old 14th Sep 2023, 14:51
  #5 (permalink)  
Alex Whittingham
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Bristol, England
Age: 65
Posts: 1,806
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This, of course, is the CAA view. They choose to regard the requirement of AMC1 ARA.ATO.105 that they should continually monitor ATOs for evidence of sufficient funding as an inconvenient EASA AMC that nobody really wants to do and they don't have the capability anyway. They disregard the changed legal status of these previous EASA rules since Brexit. Thanks to Boris, and the CAA's failure to prepare properly by writing their own set of rules, full compliance with this retained AMC by the CAA is now a statutory requirement, written into UK law. The Department of Transport or the government could have changed the law if they didn't like it, but they did not.
Alex Whittingham is offline