Originally Posted by
Max Tow
I'd argue the reverse. A corporation that unnecessarily gets involved in a finely balanced national debate such as this risks alienating substantial numbers of staff, shareholders and customers.
They don't care. That alienation is internal, and is rarely sufficient that a staff member resigns in protest, a shareholder sells his holding, or a customer actually puts their principles ahead of their pocket when push comes to shove. Sure there's grumbling, but that's all there is. The damage the companies are sh*t scared of is the reputational damage of defending themselves against the inevitable smear campaign.
Originally Posted by
Beer Baron
I rest my case.