Originally Posted by
G-FORZ
Point is there is no overriding evidence.
So the revenue per passenger being in line with LPL, EMA, MAN and LBA is not overriding evidence that Peel did not in fact divert car parking revenue to another as yet undisclosed Peel entity in some process of self sabotage? The assumption being that DSA generated more revenue in car parking alone than those much bigger and busier airports? And you cannot see the flaws in that argument?
There’s so much wrong with the stance you’re taking it’s hard to know where to start.