Originally Posted by
G-FORZ
Respectfully, if someone who appears to have had direct involvement with activity at DSA says they ‘Know’ then it would be courteous to listen.
Not when the overriding evidence is to the contrary. There’s been plenty posted all over by people who have been involved with the airport that were incorrect in their assertions. So respectfully I beg to differ. I have also been privy to information in the past that blows a lot of the theories out of the water, I wouldn’t post it and I don’t expect people to believe that on face value, but there’s enough in the public domain already to comfortably draw a conclusion. ‘Trust me dude’ isn’t a reasonable position to take, particularly when accusing a company of fraud. Also, just because someone has posted something you want to hear, doesn’t make it true.