Without the data it all basically speculation although yes, the video does not looks too good.
You don't need FOQA to show what went wrong. Unless the video has been altered in this forum, the video is the data. If a formal investigation only looked at the video then you would have a valid point.
My other point was about throwig the SOPs as the ultimate proof they were wrong. , We all have navigated outside from time to time on certain types of operations especially operating in funny places.
And if we have then we deserve the same criticism..
I'd like to think somebody said in a quite moment on tax in or at the pub debrief "ya know we shoulda GA ".
That is what is being said on pprune. Its the starting point of the discussion not the end of it. Some are saying because they got away with it no damage done. The discussion should be around why the landing was persisted with in the first place. Why would a crew ignore all the red flags for a runway excursion and "press on" to an uncertain outcome. Is it training, standards or are there lots of pilots out there who would have done exactly the same thing in the same circumstances?