Originally Posted by
Rice power
The CN involved may well be a great guy but that does not render the decision beyond analysis.
17 people claiming injuries, a CAD investigation initiated and the aircraft damaged as a result, all for 1 failed airspeed indicator(alleged) which does not render the aircraft unsafe for flight.
I doubt the insurer will take such a benevolent approach.
A CAD investigation? Has the HK Air Accident Investigation Authority formally notified CX that an AAIA investigation is initiated in accordance with ICAO Anx 13 and CAP448B?
If they haven't by now and use the MOR as the excuse to avoid an investigation that is by definition an accident (injuries) and not a serious incident there is a cover up going on.