PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - CFIT Risk 3D BARO-VNAV & 2D Approaches
View Single Post
Old 17th Jun 2023, 20:22
  #22 (permalink)  
RBF
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Buenos Aires
Age: 35
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rudestuff
Setting the wrong QNH, being given the wrong QNH or not setting QNH at all will always be a threat, especially to NPA but even to a precision approach. Even with a glide slope you could have a decision height below the runway elevation, which would only leave the radalt, assuming you have one, to save you from a surprise no-flare landing.
With nothing to cross check against, perhaps the easiest solution is for the pilot to read the QNH with the landing clearance if not visual, giving the tower controller a final chance to catch an error.

On an ILS you should be able to detect the misset QNH by doing distance altitude cross check. If actual QNH was 1003 and you had 1013 set, then you would cross the altitude crosschecks 300 ft above whats charted.
RBF is offline