I'm sure the Federal Courts have completely reformed since then. Not sure where more info would come from. Anyone appearing before the court would be a fool to mention how screwed up they are, and only those in direct contact with the Court would be able to pierce the veil (robe?) which was mentioned as a huge problem in that article.
They still say 10 cents per page returned as a search result, so if a search returns 250 documents of 10 pages each that language, however vague, seems like it's billable as $250 - with giving the user a copy of any document an additional 10 cents per page, up to $3 limit per some documents. They emphasize the way to keep the search price down is to give the exact document number. Which, for the general public, will not be known. Thus a search, billed directly to the credit card attached to the account, to find that document number might get very expensive.
Perhaps I am misunderstanding why they are so keen on making sure the user is informed of just how expensive using this service can be by using the phrase "no limit" to the cost of a search.
Nevertheless, back to the can of worms that will be blown to bits if PTSD from imagining the suffering of others can be a cause of action - can't see that turning out well, except for the lawyers. Perhaps the late night psychics can be sworn as expert witnesses to vouch for the experiences relayed by the deceased.
Perhaps the reason for the electronic window shades in new Boeing aircraft is a version of the Peril Sensitive Sunglasses** - they go black to avoid the wearer seeing what's about to happen and shield the wearer from worrying about it.
Are you just giddy at the idea of Boeing insolvency? Seems like giddy as this lawsuit hasn't anything to do with recertification testing.
**a plot device in Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams