Originally Posted by
sonicbum
Very valid point. Maybe some folks with experience on that side of the world could share more insight on local customs in those kind of situations.
The CAAC is very scientific. Problems are the multiple echelons between the regulator and the line crews, that - same as anywhere else - go out of their limb to please the boss about wishes they dream he may have had and then apply 30% CYOA margin. Results can be ridiculous.
True, when punishing which is the part of the feedback loop like that or not, CAAC are ruthless and spare no time for micromanagement. Also achieve their goals.
=====
Same as the Boeing article referenced already explains, Airbus has no technical objection for OVWT landing as long as performance figures are satisfied. The only dilemma is the legality of breaking the AFM LIM section.
Sad as this may sound, the best advice for today's aviator is to have the OPS/MX/FLEET take the decision jointly on the ground and have them deal with the fine print during their deliberations.
Safety margins are neither hurt nor improved by making an overweight landing on 10k+ runway.
For reasons beyond the scope here, it is completely unfathomable a B- registered
crew were not in contact with their AOC during any such event.