Originally Posted by
Bumblebee
That's a fair comment, and a great example of contradiction or ambiguity in the FCOM, where the Task Sharing table clearly shows the two respective actions as simultaneous, as opposed to sequentially in PRO-NOR-SUP-ENG.
Hi,
Tasksharing does not related to supplementary procedures. You must have a specifically tailored OM-B embedding the OETA and associated actions.
Originally Posted by
Bumblebee
On the other hand, the two actions are not interdependent from a technical point of view, and the order in which they are carried out is entirely inconsequential. Whereas the consequences of unnecessarily delaying Engine shutdown is an increased risk factor.
There are lots of procedures where the order they are shown matters, but this isn't one of them.
I'm quite comfortable from an Airmanship point of view, of minimising risk factors when 90% of arrivals are OETA against the rare occasions that shut-down *needs* to be delayed for FEGP to be plugged in.
There is no reason to *wait* for your colleague to switch off the Y ELEC pump before shutting the engine down.
Sorry but disagree.
You can't arbitrarily change the order of a supplementary because you believe it does not make any difference
. If this is due to the fact that your tasksharing displays the actions on the same line, I suggest you drop a mail to your tech pilot and ask for a clarification. Often those issues arise at the customization phase of the document and or when converting formats to fit the different EFBs.
.