So why is reporting the facts that should of great concern to supporters of the airport now reduced to thriving on negativity? It's either a dishonest report, evidence of mismanagement, or perhaps even worse. Please tell us all which part of the report is inaccurate or alternative why we should not be bothered.
The now struggling south side airport scheme was given away to the mayors sponsors in similar circumstances so anybody who cares about the airport should certainly be asking questions. The mayors reputation is now in tatters beyond his hard core supporters who choose to bury their heads in the sand and this in turn will impact on and damage the airport.