PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - More KC-46A woes....
View Single Post
Old 19th Apr 2023, 18:31
  #1200 (permalink)  
tdracer
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,420
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by GlobalNav
Not perfection. Meet the contract requirements and satisfy the military need. Promises promises.
But some of the requirements are silly or unrealistic. While I have no direct knowledge of the remote vision system - I know that in my area we spent lots of manpower and millions of dollars meeting a spec requirement that had no basis in reality (and the 'what part of mandatory don't you understand' was the response when I tried to explain that to the USAF reps). This stuff is all considered proprietary so I can't elaborate - but the requirement might have made sense and been meaningful on a 1950s tech engine, but had no basis in reality for a full FADEC PW4000 engine. But it was a mandatory requirement and we had to meet it.
Government bureaucracy at is inefficient finest.
tdracer is offline