The article seems to infer that since “hot starts” were supposedly the cause of an accident in 2010, that must be the case again. And even though the investigation of THAT accident revealed a software issue and Airbus provided a fix for this issue, 13 years ago, the Australian Army somehow left this one aircraft not updated for, 13 years.
Sure, I’m sure that’s what happened. 🙄 I find this pretty unlikely unless there is some supreme level of truth ineptitude in the AUS Army. Curious what others think.
FltMech