Why the six year limit?
Why would a delay to December 23 impose an impossible burden upon the Council?
WHO is going to benefit from the eviction of the current priemises?
Should we do a follow the money exercise and determine the motive of the Council to see how many Plain Brown Envelopes are involved?
If the Council is remaining silent about why the deadline.....perhaps that alone should raise questions about its intent.
Could it be there are failures on BOTH sides of this that should be acknowledged and a final delay be allowed and this time even the public will understand the true situation?
The key issue is to find a way to preserve the collection rather than finger pointing about how the situation got to where it is.
Why is a final eight month delay crucial to the Council's unpublicized plans.....where they're Public Hearings on this where the Council detailed the purpose for the new use of the land and premises currently used by the Museum?