Originally Posted by
Traffic_Is_Er_Was
I've been reading all the pages. I haven't seen a straight answer yet.
You have. I'll give it to you yet again.
The CC were complying with a requirement stipulated in their operations manual. CAR 215(9) orders them to comply with all provisions of their operations manual. This is a provision of strict liability.
Are you familiar with strict liability Traffic?
If you disagree with the policy, that is another matter. CC on the day had absolutely no choice but to issue an instruction to this bloke to move. He refused a lawful order. The police were called. Have a problem with their conduct? Call the AFP. Has nothing to do with Jetstar.