Originally Posted by
P330
Acceptable to who?
The public don’t notice and don’t care unless they’re so unreliable and disruptive which they’re not. Inside, which the public do notice, is pristine.
To aviation nerds? I suspect most like variety.
To Jet2? Clearly they are as they keep using them.
To the industry? Well Jet2 repeatedly keep winning awards as ‘the best’, including winning the top Which award yesterday.
So, can you let us know which interested parties this is unacceptable to as I am struggling to think of any.
I too am struggling to understand why a properly maintained older airframe needs to be retired if it continues to provide reliable service to customers, and just as importantly contributes positively to the company bottom line.
The obvious downside is the fuel efficiency of order generation technology but clearly Jet2 management know better than posters on an Internet forum!