Sounds like a clarification of what AWO/LVP actually is and having an ruleset to follow for the ground movements could be a good result of this. If handled with the depth it requires by the NTSB.
Because, apart from the crew being not sluggish, there were no defences broken. As in not in place.
Not taking any high ground here. The European side had the guidance yet it took many lives lost to understand what compliance is.
https://simpleflying.com/linate-airport-disaster/
https://aviation-safety.net/database...?id=20011008-0
The benefit of standardised aviation vocabulary (phraseologies) is probably forever not found in the US, rejected by the collective immune system like a transplanted organ.
But the rest of us flying in other globe quadrants are not doing much of a stellar job either. And outside of the Beautiful Country, in multinational comm environments, it is a major mistake. Much attempted plain English, longwinded and descriptive, i.s.o. focused and specific.