Originally Posted by
Timelord
Does the Coroner’s verdict render him liable to be pursued through the civil courts by the relatives where, I believe, the verdict is on balance of probability rather than beyond reasonable doubt? If so, that is probably his motive for pushing for a judicial review.
No the coroner's verdict is completely irrelevant to any issue in civil proceedings where, as you say, the proof required is on a balance of probabilities rather than the higher criminal standard. I assume, possibly wrongly, that the civil case (s) have already been settled.