The overwhelming body of scientific and medical expertise vs a fringe of random quacks.
How arrogant are you to say that a medical professional that has differing research results to what you blindly want to follow is a quack. Arrogant and supremely stupid to think you can blindly trust your pre-defined source. People like you don't deserve democracy and those who gave it to you. Why don't you go live in China where your blind trust in government will reward you with like minds.
What does it say to you when a person of Fauci's credentials tells you that taking a vaccination will prevent you getting a virus when it is patently wrong, either he's a liar or incredibly incompetent. It is on record. But you want a source? It's there, can't be erased, you work out the 'source.' You work it out, you appear to have an abundance of time. I don't.
Quacks whom you still refuse to identify or reveal where you get your information from.
Grow up. It's out there. Just because evidence that counters yours is not as prolific doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
At least the poster above revealed they where they were getting info from, and like I said, it turned out to be another HCQ myth spreading quack.
Whatever mate.