Originally Posted by
Clinton McKenzie
That may well be "some of the reasoning" behind the max seat configuration element of the definition. But, as always, the solution to one problem almost invariably creates at least one other problem. The plain words of the current definition of a flight that is 'cost-sharing' do not set a POB limit on 'cost-sharing flights'.
Sure... but since you could only, eg. legally fit 6 people in a 4 seat aircraft (2x "Adults" in the front, either 2x Adults carrying 2x babies or 4x children in back) and they know that babies/children won't be paying anything, it kinda already does.