PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Shoreham Airshow Crash Trial
View Single Post
Old 22nd Dec 2022, 13:11
  #808 (permalink)  
tucumseh
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 3,226
Received 172 Likes on 65 Posts
Originally Posted by PoacherNowGamekeeper
21 Safety Recommendations? 31, actually.
It's not so much the number of recommendations but:

(a) How many were already mandated, and,
(b) The CAA's response to some of them, revealing an alarming incompetence or lack of corporate knowledge.

In other words, the same as any MoD report.

This has all been done to death, but the one example that might interest military pilots and engineers is the CAA response to safety recommendation 2015-044, of 8 April 2016. It's complete nonsense, ignoring the concept of (e.g.) the Difference Data Manual and modification procedures/classification.

The HSE made exactly the same mistake in the Sean Cunningham case. The Difference Data Manual is what proves Martin-Baker provided the information on seat servicing that MoD and the HSE claimed had not been provided. The AAIB's Shoreham report contains multiple references to the same manuals that the HSE denied the existence of. As the HSE contributed a significant proportion of the AAIB report, it must know this, so offering even more evidence that it knowingly lied to the M-B trial judge. Linkages....
tucumseh is offline