Originally Posted by
Treble one
The 'beyond reasonable doubt' factor was the key to the accquital in the criminal trial of course. Whether the supposed cognitive impairment met that criteria can certainly be argued, but obviously the jury thought so.
Well, that his judgement was impaired one way or another is hard to deny. You don't voluntary launch yourself into a loop without room to recovery unless you have suicidal tendency. So, without going too deep into the argument I can understand why it leaned towards that kind of result at the end.
My point of view only.