Originally Posted by
HappyBandit
you're a ****. I suspect you didn't even read the article. You conveniently left out all the references to not compromising on safety or cutting corners....This isn’t cutting corners. Rather, it’s an extensive standard review process that is expedited, he said.
Regulatory agencies in the world look at two things:
- The safety of the participants and that they wouldn’t be compromised under an emergency use authorization.
- The data quality and data integrity of any submissions to the agencies.
“The standards could never be compromised even under an emergency authorization use of the vaccines.
You're an embarassment to critical thinking and proper analysis. So you lost your job in aviation hey? Comalco aluminium smelter in Gladstone are looking for workers at the moment. Not sure on their vaccine requirements however.
Hmmm… a certain Dr Malhotra would disagree. He would likely suggest if the vaccine development were properly done and not rushed with corners cut that it likely would only have been allowed to be used in the aged at their own risk. Certainly not approved for general usage until
all proper trails were completed satisfactorily.
There are good reasons why vaccine trails normally take 10 or so years to be completed..
