It is interesting to follow this type of discussion where the subject is quickly misrepresented, which then degenerates into binary debate, us vs them, 2 vs 1 crew, with 'clear cut' black and white thinking.
An alternative is to reconsider the proposal for what it is - a working paper for the need to consider technological advances with respect to:
- the feasibility of extended minimum-crew operations (eMCO)
two crew, only one on the flight deck in specific situations
and, at a later stage,
- single-pilot operations (SiPO).
There would be greater value, both for ourselves and the regulator to consider the issues. Operators have a wide range of knowledge with current systems; apply this to what is known about existing and new technologies so to contribute to the debate. Create the future opposed to decry its uncertainty.
There are already commercial single crew operations; where are the differences in risk. Two pax fatalities in a light twin vs two pax in a wide body; the ultimate debate is about unknown fatalities - unknowable outcomes, our fears.
This is not an easy debate, probably without solution with current thoughts and processes of safety management; thus time, need to think more widely:-
'The Illusion Of Risk Control'; very relevant in our modern complex world.
https://link.springer.com/book/10.10...-3-319-32939-0
N.B. Aven, chapt 3.0 and Paries 4.0, and conclusion.