Originally Posted by
CharlieMike
No idea what went on previously but it would be perfectly reasonable to decide not to progress criminally, based on insufficient evidence then subseqently conduct a non-statutory enquiry which resulted in his dismissal. The former has to be proven beyond reasonable doubt whereas the latter could be concluded on the balance of probability. Seems a likely scenario when it is someones word against another.
Thanks CM. I didn't fully appreciate that subtlety.