I have followed this debate with interest, even to the point of following up every tangent that seemed to spring out of nowhere and apparently had nothing to do with the main topic.
However, there is one thing that we must all remember here. We are being told of a 'specific' threat against a non-skymarshal carrying airline by two different governments (yes, I know the leader of one government is so far up the arse of the leader of the other one, but that's irrelevant).
These are the same two governments that went to war, invaded another sovereign state, and killed many people based upon 'evidence' of Weapons of Mass Destruction. Evidence which is, apparently, non-existant.
So why should we now believe that the Intellegence organisations of both countries have now got it right when they have (so far) failed miserably over Iraq?
Just my thoughts.
