Originally Posted by
FlightDetent
Is that true IRL or just confirmation bias?
+ the T7 crew from EK did not have an abundance of age
34 - 7,000 / 37 - 7,000
+ PIA A320 and Ethiopean MAX both had F/Os not far beyond just qualified
PIA is a bit hard to talk about as there was nothing sane about that flight... Even their licences. I'll refrain to talk about this one specifically.
Ethiopian
29 - 8,000 / 25 - 360
After the crash, the MAX was grounded and had to undergo an entirely redesign on MCAS. New training was then given. Needless to say that the crew did realise what was going on and they did switch to cutout both trim actuators.
+ Atlas 767 experience if PM was severely irregular
Both under "training watch" as they've failed basic stuff.
60 - 11,000 / 44 - 5,000
+ AirAsia F/O very wrong mix of years to hours
I should remind you that the Captain left his seat to reset unauthorised C/Bs. His 20 thousand hour experience did raise the insurance price, i guess?
Yet, not sure what you mean by "wrong mix of years to hours".
53 - 20,500 / 46 - 2,200
AF447
58 - 10,000 / 37 - 6,500 / 32 - 2,900
Asiana
49 - 12,000 / 45 - 9,600 / 40 - 4,500
So, here is your data. What exactly is the point regarding to age/hours? How did that help?