I reckon this is a very powerful point, Glen:
I note that you have previously advised that you are reluctant to “interfere” in the Ombudsman investigation. By having a reasonable doubt as to the accuracy of information provided by CASA, and choosing not to act, you are in fact choosing to interfere in the outcome, by being complicit in the provision of false and misleading information.
I would have thought that the ICC's finding as to the timing of CASA's knowledge of the details of the APTA model would, in and of itself, demand further internal investigation by any organisation with even a modicum of corporate integrity. And, if CASA is and remains of the view that the ICC's finding on that issue was wrong, CASA should tell you and the ICC why.