Do with the text whatever you like, Glen. It's a public post.
The facts will be whatever they happen to be. And if CASA's requirements set out in its email in March 19 were valid then and necessary to satisfy the criteria for approval of an 'alliance' 'base' to operate under the authority of APTA's AOC in 19, they were valid and necessary to satisfy the criteria for the approval of all 'alliance' 'bases' and, therefore, should have been imposed and explained by CASA from the outset. CASA can't have it both ways, but will of course try to have it both ways.