Originally Posted by
Lead Balloon
Whatever the theoretical circumstances - 'long bow' or not, 'very loose' or not - 'something' must surely have been construed as constituting assault and stalking of Carmody's staff. But if there is no record at all in CASA of any circumstance that has been construed by a staff member as assault or stalking by Glen, I have great difficulty in concluding anything other than that Carmody just made it up.
If that's true LB, isn't that an offence?? Making a vexatious claim about someone without proof or evidence??
The fact it was done under the umbrella of Parliamentary Privilege is just gutless, if true.
I'm not holding my breath but I believe that the Senate or the House can waive privilege if they collectively believe the statement(s) don't fit with the purpose of it.