PPRUNE Radar has put it in a nutshell.
We all get the tweaky ringpiece, bitter adrenaline mouthtaste, from time to time, when we've had a (perceived) narrow squeak.
I have always subscribed to the ' count to ten' philosophy which stops me running off at the mouth with perhaps inappropriate or exaggerated emotion, till I've had some time to think about it.
If this chap has done something dodgy, then evidence must be presented to prove this was so.
Emotion and bluster is not enough.
If no evidence is produced, there is no case to answer and the alleged perpetrator is not guilty.
And jolly good too I say:
GA has quite enough to contend with, quite apart from PPRUNE posters who want to judge, convict and sentence fellow aviators from a one-sided description of events.
Safe (and un biased) flying.
Cusco