Originally Posted by
Lead Balloon
Others have pointed out the ‘fine print’, and those others are correct. But it would be better if the ‘fine print’ were more clear and concise: “You pay us, the airline, up front for a seat that may not exist on what appears to be but is only nominally a scheduled flight, and we’ll then decide when and on what day we might condescend to provide a ‘service’ to you in return for your money. You could get stuck somewhere you don’t want to be for hours or even overnight, and if you can’t find somewhere to stay: Stiff sh*t.”
Does Australia have an "unfair terms of contract" Act