And how does “APTA withdraw their AOC cover from the business”? Again, explain to me who, precisely, does what, precisely.
I set out at #2144 what I consider to be the only practical way in which APTA could avoid further responsibility for flying training being conducted by the ‘rogue’ ‘Alliance’ ‘member’. Do you have another way?
I don’t think APTA picking up the phone and telling the ‘Alliance’ ‘member’ that ‘AOC cover’ has been ‘withdrawn’ would in itself be enough. So far as the world and CASA are concerned, the flying training being conducted by the ‘Alliance’ ‘member’ is being conducted under the authority of APTA’s AOC, unless and until CASA revokes the approval ‘covering’ that ‘base’.
Remember: It’s APTA’s AOC and it’s APTA delivering the flying training, just through ‘Alliance’ ‘members’ rather than its own employees.