The scenario I’m talking about is one in which one of APTA’s ‘Alliance’ ‘members’ fails to take action to ‘reign in’ ‘rogue’ personnel and APTA knows about it. The ‘member’ is perfectly happy to continue taking money from students for training them under the authority of APTA’s AOC.
... and my scenario was, if APTA kows about it, they issue a direction to the instructor, and if that instructor fails to follow it (perhaps with the *wink* *wink* nod of the business owner), then APTA would withraw their AOC cover from the business.
Same effect, n'est pas?