Originally Posted by
MagnumPI
My favourite part from that ANAO report:
In other words, CASA investigates the effectiveness of themselves, produces a report that is apparently "great work" according to the board, but does nothing, and doesn't even file it in their own record system or circulate it.
That pretty much sums up CASA - a vacant space that is useful for nothing. And speaking of ‘surveillance philosophy’, an industry acquaintance recently showed me some written correspondence between himself and CASA about a matter, and CASA internally submitted that correspondence as ‘surveillance’. Ha. What a joke. Write a letter to CASA and that is classed as regulatory surveillance! Don’t get me wrong, it’s a good thing that their budget is tight and they want the inspectorate to stay In their offices so that financial budgets can be attained by having staff travel less. But to call letter writing ‘surveillance’ is laughable. Muppets.