PRC is not a member under Article 23(1), the Republic of China is.
Wasn't the ROC / PRC thing resolved with Resolution 2758?
Originally Posted by
Less Hair
Whatever you do you considering the SC you would need China on your side doing it. Why would they want to loose some -now weakened- second voter on their side? Below the line: Unrealistic.
Still the General Assembly might get things moving somehow.
Given that China has the veto and can use it when it please, do they ned a second voter on their side or would they perhaps prefer to be able to name their price when exercising the veto on Russia's behalf?