Originally Posted by
admikar
It's things like this that fuel Russian paranoia about West being their enemy. As much as understandable his actions were, law is a law. He damaged someone's property and penalty should be applied.
Someone above this post said that borders are indisputable and if you don't like them, move to another country. West stomped over those same principles in the past and somehow that is fine? How do you decide what is fine and what is not?
He remains charged with the offence and will probably be tried in due course. The penalty will be commensurate with the crime.
Lumping so many different countries and cultures as 'the west' really illustrates the xenophobia and paranoia that have been propagated by your authoritarian propganda machine. Shame on you for believing it.