Originally Posted by
NutLoose
Agreed and that will result in a retaliatory, the other worry would be it’s being close to Chernobyl.
Given NATO's structure, this would have to be discussed, and with 30 members that would take some time. Presumably in such a situation, retaliation has to follow quickly, or it loses its impact/rationale ( apologies for poor wording, nothing better occured to me ). Is my thinking right there ? I am assuming that there is no pre-set agreement for who would do what because the situation is unique ( so far ).