Originally Posted by
twentyelevens
Here and elsewhere in this thread is where you demonstrate the only rhetorical weapon you have to use is attacking the person making the argument; you won’t go near the argument itself, because you can’t.
The jig is up buddy.
No, you exacley make my case. This was in response to saying WHO the data came from was a factor in whether to think the data was accurate- it isn't. I was aying "who funds the data" is exactley what you accuse me of- attacking the reporter not the data.
Now, of course, you attack me without addressing my argument....