Vaccine mandates ensure the rate of vaccination is high amongst society.
Vaccination rates are now at 95% first dose, 93% second dose and 43% booster in WA. The job is done. Yet the most draconian 'rules' are in WA. Why? You've got dream rates of vaccination.
More people getting vaccinated for critical jobs means less sickness at work, fewer shortages and more productivity. So business loves it, that's why many companies will fund flu vaccines for employees.
OK, so vaccinated workers are not getting the covid? That's where your argument falls apart.
I see vaccine mandates as a prime example of collective rights vs individual rights.
Now we're getting to the crux of the mandates, pure communism dressed up nicely as socialism. But don't worry, we can demonise the 'nutjobs' even though the vast majority of protesters are reasonable people that don't fall victim to groupthink.
Collective rights, no thanks, not for me.
So why do all anti vaxxers just shout out the same old talking points? "Vaccines are dangerous", "vaccines are ineffective", "Covid is not that much of a problem", "muh rights" etc?
So all of the 'nutjobs' are 'muh rights' ranters are they?
All you confirm is that a rational conversation can't be had with a leftwing Stalinist.
Do you support the removal of access to publicly funded healthcare for unvaccinated patients?
Do you support the withdrawal of healthcare to an obese person that chugs KFC for breakfast, Maccas for lunch and Dominos for dinner?
Do you support the withdrawal of healthcare to a type 2 diabetic that continues to drink 5 cans of coke a day and eats sausage rolls for brekky?
Do you support the withdrawal of healthcare to a smoker, a drug addict, a mentally ill person?
They are all making choices that affect their health outcomes.
No I don't, not for any of those groups including the unvaccinated. Snookered yourself eh??