PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Russia - Military Strength vs Expenditure. How do they do it?
Old 25th Jan 2022, 20:15
  #37 (permalink)  
NutLoose
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,117
Received 2,957 Likes on 1,261 Posts
Originally Posted by soarbum
They may all look the same and share the same design principles but they have upgraded. The AK-47 was in use from 1949 to 1974 chambering 7.62x39mm. From 1974 to 1991, they used the AK-74 chambering a smaller 5.45x39mm round. Since 1991, they have been using a modernised version designated the AK-74M (same ammo).
It’s called development, improvement of a superb simple design through operational experience.

Where as we jumped from the .303 Lee Enfield to the 7.62 SLR to the 5.56 SA80 after the stillborn Bullpup, and now are looking at a variant of the 5.56 M4 for part of our forces. It’s a shame we never developed the SLR on as it was a superb weapon with an effective range. Something the SA80 proved to lack thus having to introduce a 7.62 L129A1 to recoup that loss.

One Weapon that did evolve was the .303 Bren that was rechambered as a 7.62 LMG.

One weapon in our arsenal apart from the .50 cal that can trace its lineage back to 1934 and the German MG34 through the MG42 is the 7.62 GPMG
NutLoose is offline